INNOVATIONOLOGY: A GOUNDBREAKING TRANSDISCIPLINARY FRAMEWORK FOR SUSTAINABLE AND EQUITABLE DEVELOPMENT IN AFRICA

Author: Pitshou Moleka, PhD

ABSTRACT

The development landscape in Africa has been shaped by persistent challenges and unmet aspirations, with traditional, top-down approaches frequently failing to address the complex, context-specific needs and potentials of African societies. In response to this, the innovationology paradigm, a pioneering transdisciplinary framework, has emerged as a promising new approach to driving sustainable and equitable development across the continent. This article presents a comprehensive exploration of the innovationology framework, drawing on rigorous qualitative analyses to demonstrate its transformative potential. Through in-depth case studies, the study unpacks the key components, theoretical underpinnings, and practical applications of innovationology, highlighting its capacity to empower marginalized communities, foster collaborative innovation, and catalyze systemic change. The findings reveal the multifaceted ways in which innovationology-informed initiatives have addressed pressing development challenges, such as access to clean water, sustainable agriculture, inclusive entrepreneurship, maternal and child health, and renewable energy, across diverse African contexts. Importantly, the article underscores the versatility of the innovationology approach in leveraging virtual and online platforms to overcome logistical and infrastructural barriers, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic. By synthesizing the theoretical foundations, empirical insights, and critical success factors, the article presents an integrated conceptual model that offers a comprehensive, transdisciplinary framework for understanding the transformative potential of innovationology. The implications of this framework are far-reaching, as it challenges traditional development models, champions frugal and inclusive innovation, encourages transdisciplinary collaboration, and embraces decolonial and postcolonial praxis. The study’s findings have significant implications for the development discourse and practice in Africa, with the potential to reshape trajectories towards more sustainable, equitable, and self-determined pathways. By pursuing future research and implementation directions, the innovationology paradigm can continue to evolve, adapt, and contribute to the realization of a more inclusive and prosperous future for the African continent.

Keywords: Innovationology, Sustainable Development, Frugal Innovation, Inclusive Innovation, Transdisciplinary Collaboration, Decolonial Praxis, Africa, Transformation, Marginalized, Postcolonial, Frugal Innovation, Inclusive Innovation, Design Thinking, Frantz Fanon, Complexity Theory, Paulo Freire, Indigenous Knowledge, COVID-19

REFERENCES

  • Achmad, G. N., Yudaruddin, R., Nugroho, B. A., Fitrian, Z., Suharsono, S., Adi, A. S., … & Fitriansyah, F. (2023). Government support, eco-regulation and eco-innovation adoption in SMEs: The mediating role of eco-environmental. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 9(4), 100158.
  • Anjanappa, J., Kuvelkar, R., & Bhattacharya, A. (2023). Renewable Energy Technologies (RETs) in India: Opportunities and Challenges from a Frugal Innovation Perspective. Available at SSRN 4381239.
  • Benítez, B., Nelson, E., Romero Sarduy, M. I., Ortiz Perez, R., Crespo Morales, A., Casanova Rodriguez, C., & Daniels, J. (2020). Empowering women and building sustainable food systems: A case study of cuba’s local agricultural Innovation Project. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 4, 554414.
  • Bhatti, Y. A., Ventresca, M., Matin, N., & Ashraf, N. (2018). Expanding the building blocks of frugal innovation. Sustainability, 10(2), 538.
  • Brem, A., & Wolfram, P. (2014). Research and development from the bottom up-introduction of terminologies for new product development in emerging markets. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 3(1), 1-22.
  • Brown, T. (2008). Design thinking. Harvard Business Review, 86(6), 84.
  • Brown, T., & Wyatt, J. (2010). Design thinking for social innovation. Development Outreach, 12(1), 29-43.
  • Byrne, D., & Callaghan, G. (2014). Complexity theory and the social sciences: The state of the art. Routledge.
  • Cilliers, P. (1998). Complexity and postmodernism: Understanding complex systems. Routledge.
  • Cilliers, P. (2000). What can we learn from a theory of complexity? Emergence, 2(1), 23-33.
  • Cross, N. (2011). Design thinking: Understanding how designers think and work. Berg.
  • Díaz-Chorne, L., Osanz, L., & González, M. B. (2022). The Challenges of Co-creation Processes on Developing ICT Solutions for Migrant Inclusion: Lessons from the Field. In Information and Communications Technology in Support of Migration (pp. 249-271). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  • Dorst, K. (2011). The core of ‘design thinking’ and its application. Design studies, 32(6), 521-532.
  • Escobar, A. (2011). Encountering development: The making and unmaking of the Third World. Princeton University Press.
  • Escobar, A. (2012). Sustainability: Design for the pluriverse. Development, 55(3), 309-312.
  • Fanon, F. (1963). The wretched of the earth. Grove Press.
  • Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Herder and Herder.
  • Geels, F. W. (2004). From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory. Research policy, 33(6-7), 897-920.
  • Geels, F. W. (2005). Processes and patterns in transitions and system innovations: refining the co-evolutionary multi-level perspective. Technological forecasting and social change, 72(6), 681-696.
  • Giroux, H. A. (2020). On critical pedagogy. Bloomsbury Publishing. Gupta, A. K. (2010). Grassroots green innovations for inclusive, sustainable development. The Global Innovation Index, 13, 107-115.
  • Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24.
  • Heeks, R., Foster, C., & Nugroho, Y. (2014). New models of inclusive innovation for development. Innovation and Development, 4(2), 175-185.
  • Hoekstra, J. S. C. M., & Gentili, M. (2020). Action plans on the co-creation process: A theoretical and methodological framework.
  • Khan, R. (2016). How frugal innovation promotes social sustainability. Sustainability, 8(10), 1034.
  • Lam, A., Martín-López, B., Wiek, A., Bennett, E. M., Frantzeskaki, N., Horcea-Milcu, A. I., & Lang, D. J. (2020). Scaling the impact of sustainability initiatives: a typology of amplification processes. Urban Transformations, 2(1), 1-24.
  • Liedtka, J. (2015). Perspective: Linking design thinking with innovation outcomes through cognitive bias reduction. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(6), 925-938.
  • Markard, J., Raven, R., & Truffer, B. (2012). Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects. Research policy, 41(6), 955-967.
  • Mazorodze, A., & Mkhize, P. (2022). An investigation into the knowledge–sharing practices for innovation in higher education institutions of developing countries. The Journal for Transdisciplinary Research in Southern Africa, 18(1), 7 pages. doi:https://doi.org/10.4102/td.v18i1.1230
  • Mazzocchi, F. (2006). Western science and traditional knowledge. Despite their variations, different forms of knowledge can learn from each other. EMBO reports, 7(5), 463–466. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.embor.7400693
  • McLaren, P. (2015). Life in schools: An introduction to critical pedagogy in the foundations of education. Routledge.
  • McLaren, P., & Kincheloe, J. L. (Eds.). (2007). Critical pedagogy: Where are we now? Peter Lang.
  • Mignolo, W. D. (2011). The darker side of western modernity: Global futures, decolonial options. Duke University Press.
  • Moleka, P. (2024a). Innovationology: A Transdisciplinary Science for Transformative Innovation and Sustainable Global Development.
  • Moleka, P. (2024b). Innovationology: A Comprehensive, Transdisciplinary Framework for Driving Transformative Innovation in the 21st Century.
  • Moleka, P. (2024c). Léxique des Mots Techniques dans le Domaine d’Innovation. EUE.
  • Moleka, P. (2024d). Frugal Innovation for Inclusive and Sustainable Development in Africa. Advanced Research in Economics and Business Strategy Journal, 5(1), 107-117.
  • Morin, E. (2005). Restricted complexity, general complexity. In Worldviews, science and us (pp. 5-29). World Scientific.
  • Mulvale, G., Green, J., Robert, G., Larkin, M., Vackerberg, N., Kjellström, S., Hossain, P., Moll, S., Lim, E., & Craythorne, S. L. (2024). Adopting, implementing and assimilating coproduced health and social care innovations involving structurally vulnerable populations: findings from a longitudinal, multiple case study design in Canada, Scotland and Sweden. Health research policy and systems, 22(1), 42. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-024-01130-w
  • Mwongera, V. N. (2024). The digital transformation of diplomacy: the implications of food sovereignty and continental policy in Africa. PhD thesis, Selenius University.
  • Ndlovu-Gatsheni, S. J. (2013). Coloniality of power in postcolonial Africa: Myths of decolonization. African Books Collective.
  • Nhamo, G., & Mjimba, V. (Eds.). (2020). Sustainable Development Goals and Institutions of Higher Education. Springer.
  • Orlikowski, W. J. (1992). The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization science, 3(3), 398-427.
  • Paunov, C. (2013). Innovation and inclusive development: A discussion of the main policy issues. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, 2013/01, OECD Publishing.
  • Prabhu, J. (2017). Frugal innovation: doing more with less for more. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 375(2095), 20160372.
  • Ramalingam, B., Jones, H., Reba, T., & Young, J. (2008). Exploring the science of complexity: Ideas and implications for development and humanitarian efforts. Overseas Development Institute (ODI).
  • Ropohl, G. (1999). Philosophy of socio-technical systems. Society for Philosophy and Technology Quarterly Electronic Journal, 4(3).
  • Sachs, J. D. (2005). The end of poverty: Economic possibilities for our time. Penguin.
  • Sachs, J. D. (2012). From millennium development goals to sustainable development goals. The Lancet, 379(9832), 2206-2211.
  • Santos, B. D. S. (2014). Epistemologies of the South: Justice against epistemicide. Routledge.
  • Schot, J., & Steinmueller, W. E. (2018). Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change. Research Policy, 47(9), 1554-1567.
  • Sovacool, B. K. (2014). What are we doing here? Analyzing fifteen years of energy scholarship and proposing a social science research agenda. Energy Research & Social Science, 1, 1-29.
  • Steen, M. (2013). Co-design as a process of joint inquiry and imagination. Design Issues, 29(2), 16-28.
  • Swilling, M., & Annecke, E. (2012). Just transitions: Explorations of sustainability in an unfair world. Juta and Company Ltd.(2015). transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. United Nations.
  • Vourc’h, G., Brun, J., Ducrot, C., Cosson, J. F., Le Masson, P., & Weil, B. (2018). Using design theory to foster innovative cross-disciplinary research: lessons learned from a research network focused on antimicrobial use and animal microbes’ resistance to antimicrobials. Veterinary and Animal Science, 6, 12-20.
  • Waage, J., Yap, C., Bell, S., Levy, C., Mace, G., Pegram, T., Unterhalter, E., Dasandi, N., Hudson, D., Kock, R., Mayhew, S., Marx, C., & Poole, N. (2015). Governing the UN sustainable development goals: interactions, infrastructures, and institutions. The Lancet. Global health, 3(5), e251–e252. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(15)70112-9
  • Wa Thiong’o, N. (1986). Decolonising the mind: The politics of language in African literature. James Currey.
  • Walby, S. (2007). Complexity theory, systems theory, and multiple intersecting social inequalities. Philosophy of the social sciences, 37(4), 449-470.