HOLACRACY IN SPORT MANAGEMENT: TRANSITION FROM TRADITIONAL STRUCTURES TO PARTICIPATORY MODELS
Author: Dr. Turan Başkonuş
ABSTRACT
The aim of this paper is to investigate the potential, advantages and applicability of the holacracy management model in sport management. In addition, it is also one of the main objectives of the study to evaluate the contributions that can be provided by the transition from traditional hierarchical structures to participatory models such as holacracy and the challenges that this transition brings. In this respect, this article evaluates the potential, advantages and applicability of holacracy as an innovative management model in sport management. Replacing traditional hierarchical structures, holacracy aims to increase organisational agility by offering employees more autonomy, flexibility and participation. In this study, the foundations of the holacracy concept are discussed and the contributions and challenges of this model in sport management are analysed in detail. The literature review revealed that holacracy supports fast decision-making processes in sport organisations, encourages innovation and increases the creativity of individuals. However, it is also emphasised that factors such as organisational adaptation, cultural challenges and cost may pose difficulties in the implementation process. As a future perspective, it is suggested that the integration of holacracy model into sport management should be carefully planned and hybrid models should be developed.
Keywords: Sport, Sport Management, Holacracy
REFERENCES
- Balcı, B., & Kalfa, M. (2024). Bilgi çağında modern liderlik yaklaşımları ve spor yönetimi. Iğdır Üniversitesi Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 7(2), 25-33.
- Bernstein, E., Bunch, J., Canner, N., & Lee, M. (2016). Beyond the holacracy hype. Harvard business review, 94(7), 8.
- Bih, B. F. (2022). Improving sports performance using sports analytics: a literature review.
- Biłyk, A. (2017). Holokracje–empowerment w organizacji. Edukacja ekonomistów i menedżerów, 43(1), 157-171.
- Bodie, M. T. (2017). Holacracy and the Law. Del. J. Corp. L., 42, 619.
- Chen, Y. T. (2017). On the Essential Characteristics of the Innovation Oriented Management Mode: Holacracy. In 3rd International Conference on Social, Education and Management Engineering (pp. 194-198).
- Gajdosík, R., & Skorková, Z. (2024). A Bibliometric Analysis of Holacracy and Key Trends in Its Research Landscape Across Europe. Proceedings of IAC in Budapest 2024, 136.
- Genç, N. (2017). Yönetim ve Organizasyon: Çağdaş Sistemler ve Yaklaşımlar. (5. Baskı), Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
- Göksel, A. G. (2024). Spor Yönetiminde Dönüşüm: Holakrasi ile Geleceğe Yolculuk. International Journal of Social and Humanities Sciences Research (JSHSR), 11(109), 1383-1395.
- Göksel, A. G., Yenginar, S., & Çolakoğlu, K. (2024). Yeni yönetim modeli olan holakrasinin spor bilimleri öğrencileri perspektifinden incelenmesi. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 9(2), 206-221.
- Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associatedmethodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
- Koçel, T. (2020). İşletme Yöneticiliği, (18. Baskı), İstanbul: Beta Yayınları.
- Krasulja, N., Radojević, I., & Janjušić, D. (2016, October). Holacracy-the new management system. In Proceedings of the international scientific conference, Njs, Serbia (Vol. 13).
- Liebert, F. (2020). Holacracy as a new approach to new product development in it industry–case study. Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie/Politechnika Śląska.
- Matosic, D., Ntoumanis, N., & Quested, E. (2016). Antecedents of need supportive and controlling interpersonal styles from a self-determination theory perspective: A review and implications for sport psychology research. Sport and exercise psychology research, 145-180.
- Nair, D. R. (2016). Holacracy in academia. SCMS Journal of Indian Management, 13(1), 4.
- Noori, N. A., & Tinaztepe, C. (2022). An exploratory research on holacracy: A new governance process for the organızatıons. Pearson Journal, 7(17), 101-119.
- Öğüt, E. (2014). Türkiye’de Spor Yönetiminin Neoliberal Dönüşümü. Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 47(4).
- Özalp, İnan (2010), İşletme Yönetimi, Nisan Kitabevi, Eskişehir
- Paré, G., & Kitsiou, S. (2017). Methods for literature reviews. In F. Lau& C. Kuziemsky (Eds.), Handbook of eHealth Evaluation: An Evidence-Based Approach (pp. 157–179). University of Victoria.
- Robertson, B. J. (2015). Holacracy: The revolutionary management system that abolishes hierarchy. Penguin UK.
- Sarıoğlu Uğur, S. (2017). Yönetimde yeni bir örgütsel davranış modeli: Holakrasi. The Journal of Academic Social Science, 59, 211-218.
- Schell, S., & Bischof, N. (2022). Change the way of working. Ways into self‐organization with the use of Holacracy: An empirical investigation. European management review, 19(1), 123-137.
- Springer, S. (2014). Human geography without hierarchy. Progress in Human Geography, 38(3), 402-419.
- Şeremet, G. G., & Uçakkuş, P. (2023). Sağlıkta yeni bir yönetim anlayışı: Holakratik yönetim. Avrasya Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 6(2), 60-66.
- Weirauch, L., Galliker, S., & Elfering, A. (2023). Holacracy, a modern form of organizational governance predictors for person-organization-fit and job satisfaction. Frontiers in psychology, 13, 1021545.