THE EFFECTS OF THE FATIH PROJECT ON THE EFL EDUCATION IN TURKEY

Authors: Burcu Basoglu Saritas & Baha Cankut Saritas

ABSTRACT

This study explores the effects of the Fatih Project, a nationwide smart school project funded by the government, on the EFL education in Turkey. The purpose of this study is to provide an accurate analysis of FB’s impact on foreign language learners and on the process of learning a second language (L2) is necessary. This research project seeks to add knowledge and new findings in this regard.

REFERENCES

  • Abedalaziz, N., Jamaluddin, S., & Leng, C.H. (2013)Measuring Attitudes towards Computer and Internet Usage among Postgraduates Students in Malaysia. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology – April 2013, Volume 12 Issue 2.
  • Abu Naba’h, A., Hussain, J., Al-Omari, A., & Shdeifat, S. (2009, October). The Effect of Computer Assisted Language Learning in Teaching English Grammar on the Achievement of Secondary Students in Jordan. The International Arab Journal of Information Technology, 6(4), 431-439.
  • Almudibry, K. (2012). The effectiveness of a CALL multimedia classroom on L2 learners’ achievements, attitudes and the word solving strategies’ frequencies and the perceptions of helpfulness, when compared with learners in traditional classrooms: A quasi-experimental study.
  • Aimin, Liang. “The Study of Second Language Acquisition Under Socio-Cultural Theory.” American Journal of Educational Research 1.5 (2013): 162-167
  • Antos, Eija Ventola & Tilo Weber (Eds.), Handbooks of Applied Linguistics. Volume 2: Interpersonal Communication (pp. 509–540). Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Award and Alkaraki (2013). Attitudes of students towards using computers in learning English. English for Specific Purposes World, Issue 37, Vol,13, 2013.
  • Bakr, S. M. (2011). Attitudes of Egyptian teachers towards computers. Contemporary Educational Technology, 2(4), 308-318.
  • Barrier, T. B., & Margavio, T. M. (1993). Pretest-posttest measure of introductory computer students’ attitudes toward computers. Journal of Information Systems Education, 5(3), 1-6.
  • Basoz, T., & Cubukcu, F. (2014, April). The effectiveness of computer assisted instruction on vocabulary. Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 4(1), 44-54.
  • Bas, G. &. (2009, July). Effects of CALL Method and Dyned Language Programme on Students’ Achievement Levels and Attitudes. . International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning: http://www.itdl.org/Journal/Jul_09/article03 adresinden alınmıştır
  • Bax, S.  (2003). CALL—Past, Present and Future. Department of Language Studies, Canterbury Christ Church University College, Canterbury
  • Beauvois, M. (1998) Conversations in slow motion: Computer-mediated communication in the foreign language classroom. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 54(2), 198-217.
  • Becker, H. J., & Riel, M. M. (2000). Teacher Professional Engagement and Constructivist-Compatible Computer Use. Teaching, Learning, and Computing: 1998 National Survey. Report# 7.
  • Chapelle, C. & Jamiesson, J.1986 “Computer-assisted language learning as a predictor of success in acquiring English as a second language”. TESOL Quarterly. 20: 27-46.
  • Chien, Y.-C. (2011). EFFECTS OF COMPUTER-ASSISTED LANGUAGE LEARNING (CALL) INSTRUCTION. Orlando, Florida.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods Approaches. London: Sage Publications, Inc.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five  traditions (2nd Ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Daigle,R.J.(2003).Computer attitudes of traditional versus non-traditional accounting students. Fifth Annual Information Systems Educator Association Conference and Faculty Training. Louisiana State University Department of Accounting E.J. Ourso  College of Business Administration Baton Rouge, LA 70803- 6304 225-578-  6275.rjdaigle@lsu.edu
  • Donna M. Mertens (2014) Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology: Integrating Diversity With Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methods. London: SAGE Publications.
  • Garcia,Juan,Coll. (2001). An instrument to help teachers assess learners’ attitudes towards multimedia instruction. Education, 122(1).94-101.
  • Ali, G. Ö. K., & YILDIRIM, Z. (2015). Investigation of FATIH Project within the Scope of Teachers, School Administrators and YEGITEK Administrators’ Opinions: A Multiple Case Study. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 11(2).
  • Granito, Mark and Chernobilsky, Ellina, “The Effect of Technology on a Student’s Motivation and Knowledge Retention” (2012).NERA Conference Proceedings 2012. Paper 17. http://digitalcommons.uconn.edu/nera_2012/17
  • Gündüz, N. (2005). Computer Assisted Language Learning: Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies Vol.1, No.2, October 2005
  • Hall, K.J. (2002). Teaching and Researching: Language and Culture. Essex: Pearson Education.
  • Hashim, H. R. and Mustapha, W. N. (2004). Attitudes towards learning about and working with computers of students at UITM. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 3 (2), 1303-6521.
  • Helle Neergaard, John P. Ulh_i (2007) Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods in Entrepreneurship. Glos: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Hernández, J.A., J.R. Hernández, M.V. De Moya, F.J. García and R. Bravo (2010) Estilos de aprendizaje y TIC en la formación del alumno universitario de Magisterio. CiDd: II Congrés Internacional de Didàctiques.
  • Hubbard, P. (2016). An Invitation to CALL  Foundations of Computer-Assisted Language Learning.  Lınguıstıcs Department –Stanford Unıversıty International Society For Technology In Education Policy Brief . (2008, June).
  • Ipiña Larrañaga, N. (2012) The Use of Wikis in a CLIL-POL Context as Tools for Collaborative Writing. Impact of Attitudes. PhD Thesis. Eskoriatza: Mondragon University.
  • Isman, A., Çağlar, M., Dabaj, F., Altınay, Z. & Altınay, F. (2004). Attitudes of students toward computers. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology – TOJET, 3 (1), Article 2.
  • James P. Lantolf (1994) “Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning: Introduction to the Special Issue. The Modern Language Journal, Vol. 78, No. 4, pp. 418-420.
  • Kadel, R. (2005). How Teacher Attitudes Affect Technology Integration. Learning & leading with technology, 32(5), 34.
  • Kalelioğlu, F., & Akbaba-Altun, S. (2014). Middle school students’ perceptions and expectations about tablet PCs in TURKEY. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Thought, 4(2), 301-307.
  • Karakas, A. (2011). Motivational Attitudes of ELT Students towards Using Computers for Writing and Communication. The Journal of Teaching English with Technology, 11(3), 37-53.
  • Kathryn H. Au (1998) Social Constructivism and the School Literacy Learning of Students of Diverse Backgrounds. Journal of Literacy Research Volume 30, Number 2,1998, Pages 297-319.
  • Kay, R. H. (1990). Predicting student teacher commitment to the use of computers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 6(3), 299-309.
  • Kay, R. H. (2008). Exploring gender differences in computer-related behavior: Past, present, and future. In T. T. Kidd & I. Chen (Eds.), Social information     technology: Connecting society and cultural issues(pp. 12-30). Hershey, PA:   Information Science reference.
  • Kenneth J. Gergen (1985) Social Constructionist Inquiry: Context and Implications. Portions of this chapter appeared in American Psychologist, 1985, 40, 266–275.
  • Kessler, G. (2007). Formal and informal CALL preparation and teacher attitude toward technology. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20(2), 173-188.
  • Krendl, K. A., Broihier, M. C., & Fleetwood, C. (1989). Children and computers: Do sex‐related differences persist?. Journal of communication, 39(3), 85-93.
  • Lantolf J.P. and Thorne S.L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Liang Aimin (2013) “The Study of Second Language Acquisition Under Socio-Cultural Theory”. American Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 1, No. 5, 162-167.
  • Loyd, B. H., Loyd, D. E., & Gressard, C. P. (1987). Gender and computer experience as factors in the computer attitudes of middle school students. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 7(1), 13-19.
  • Linden, L. (2008, June 3). Complement or Substitute? The Effect of Technology on Student Achievement inIndia.J-AL
  • Lunde, K. (1990). Using electronic mail as a medium for foreign language study and instruction. CALICO Journal, 7(3), 68–78.
  • Mangal, S. (2013) Research methodology in Behavioral sciences. Delhi: PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd.
  • Mason, J. (2005) “From eLearning to eKnowledge,” Knowledge Management Tools and Techniques, Citeseer.
  • Michael G. Moore, Greg Kearsley (2011) Distance Education: A Systems View of Online Learning. Wadsworth: Cengage Learning.
  • Mitra, A. (1998) .Categories of computer use and their relationships with attitudes toward   computers. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 30, 281-95.
  • Namlıca, Ö. (2010). English language teachers’ perceptions of Computer Assisted Language Learning (CALL) within the context of Turkish state schools. Unpublished master’s thesis, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Çanakkale, Turkey.
  • Nowman, C. The Efficacy of Computer-Assisted Language Learning Software.
  • Onsoy, S. (2004). Students‟ and teachers‟ attitudes towards the use of computer-assisted language learning at the preparatory school of Celal Bayar University. Unpublished Master‟ s Thesis. Bilkent University Insttitute of Social Sciences, Ankara.
  • Paramskas, D. M. (1982). Courseware-software interfaces: some designs and some problems. CALICO Journal, 1(3), 4-6.
  • Polkinghorne,D.E. (2005). Language and meaning: Data collection in qualitative research.  Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52 (2), 137–145
  • Sadik, A. (2006). Factors influencing teachers’ attitudes toward personal use and school use of computers new evidence from a developing nation. Evaluation Review, 30(1), 86-113.
  • Sengel, E., Oncu, S., & Göktalay, S. B. (2014). Achievement in Language Learning: Effects of Various Computer Assisted Activıties and Computer Literacy. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 29(1), 267-279.
  • Sanaoui, R., & Lapkin, S. (1992). A case study of an FSL senior secondary course integrating computer networking. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 43(3), 524-552.
  • Sandy Q. Qu and John Dumay (2011) The qualitative research interview. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Vol. 8 No. 3, pp. 238-264
  • St. John, E., & Cash, D. (1995). Language learning via e-mail: Demonstrable success with German. In M. Warschauer (Ed.), Virtual connections: Online activities and projects for networking language learners (pp. 191–197). Honolulu: HI: University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.
  • Sharon K. Deckert, Caroline H. Vickers (2011) An Introduction to Sociolinguistics: Society and Identity. London: A&C Black.
  • Siragusa, L. and K.C. Dixon (2009) Theory of Planned Behaviour: Higher Education Students’ Attitudes towards ICT-based Learning Interaction. Proceedings ASCILITE Auckland, Australia. pp. 969-980.
  • Sokucu, F. G. (2014). A Study On The Attıtudes Of Elt Teachers
  • Seljan, S. & Berger, N.  (2006). Computer-Assisted Language Learning (CALL). Department of Information Sciences, Faculty of Philosophy
  • Swan, K. (2005). A constructivist model for thinking about learning online. In J. Bourne & J. C.
  • Tafazoli,  D.& Golshan N.  (2014). Review of Computer-Assisted Language Learning:History, Merits & Barriers. Islamic Azad Universit Iran
  • Tekerek, M., ALTAN, T., & GÜNDÜZ, I. (2014). FATIH Projesinde Tablet PC Kullanımına Yönelik Öğrenci Tutumlarının İncelenmesi. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATICS TECHNOLOGIES, 7(2).
  • Toward Computer Assısted Language Learnıng. Unpublished Mater’s Thesis. Çağ Unıversıty Institute of Social Sciences, Mersin.
  • Wang T. P.    The Difficulties and Challenges of Teachers’ Integrating Computer Assisted  Instruction into Teaching. Hsing Wu College
  • Warschauer, M. (1996). Motivational aspects of using computers for writing and communication. In M. Warschauer (Ed.), Telecollaboration in foreign language learning: Proceedings of the Hawai’i symposium (Technical Report # 12; pp. 29-46). Honolulu: University of Hawai’i, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center.
  • Warschauer, M. & Healey, D.  (1998). Computers and language learning: an overviewUniversity of Hawai’i,Deborah Healey Oregon State University, USA
  • Yıldırım, S., & Kaban, A. (2010). Attitudes of pre-service teachers about computer supported education. International Journal of Human Sciences, 7(2), 158-168.
  • Zereyalp, S. A. (2009). EFL Teacher Educators‟ Attitudes Towards CALL: Case of Turkish State Universities. Unpublished Mater‟ s Thesis. Cukurova University Institute of Social Sciences, Adana.