ENHANCING HIGHER EDUCATION IN SRI LANKA: AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE FEASIBILITY OF IMPLEMENTING THE CONNECTED LEARNING MODEL IN PUBLIC UNIVERSITIES

Author: Rizna Bishri

ABSTRACT

In today’s higher education landscape, integrating technology and innovative pedagogical approaches is essential for enhancing student engagement and learning outcomes. This studyinvestigatesthe potential of the Connected Learningmodel within Sri Lanka’s public universities. Drawing on digital connectivity, collaboration, and informal learning principles, it explores the feasibility and challenges of its implementation. Utilizing a mixed-methods approach, including surveys, interviews, and document analysis, this research collects data from administrators, faculty, and students in select public universities. It evaluates the current state of Sri Lankanhigher education, identifies areas for improvement, and assesses the applicability of the Connected Learning model. Additionally, the study examines the technological infrastructure of public universities in Sri Lanka and analyzes pedagogical strategies to seamlessly integrate technology and informal learning into formal education, emphasizing student-centered experiences. Identifying potential adoption obstacles, this research proposes phased implementation strategies. Its contributions include valuable insights for policymakers and educators, fostering a dynamic, technology- enhancedlearning environment in Sri Lanka andaligningwith global higher education trends.

Keywords: Connected Learning, Higher Education, feasibility and implementation, public universities in Sri Lanka

REFERENCES

  • Altbach, P. G., & de Wit, H. (2017). The global future of higher education and the academic profession: The BRICs and the United States. Springer.
  • Altbach, P. G., & de Wit, H. (2017). The international imperative in higher education. In P. G. Altbach & H. de Wit (Eds.), Trends in global higher education: Tracking an academic revolution (pp. 1-10). Sense Publishers.
  • Bates, T. (2019). Teaching in a Digital Age: Guidelines for Designing Teaching and Learning for a Digital Age. Tony Bates Associates Ltd.
  • Bates, T., & Sangra, A. (2011). Managing technology in higher education: Strategies for transforming teaching and learning. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Bowen, G. A. (2009) ‘Document analysis as a qualitative research method’, Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), pp. 27-40.
  • Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
  • De Silva, P. (2014). The transformation of Sri Lankan education. In J. E. Petrovic & H. L. M. Visser (Eds.), Globalization and Internationalization in Higher Education (pp. 119-136). Sense Publishers.
  • Department for Education. (2021). Skills for jobs: Lifelong learning for opportunity and growth. UK Government.
  • Department of Education, Skills and Employment. (2021). National standards for online higher education providers. Australian Government.
  • Fernando, M., & Samarasinghe, K. (2015). Public higher education in Sri Lanka: Challenges and opportunities. In D. K. Deardorff, H. de Wit, J. D. Heyl, & T. Adams (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of International Higher Education (pp. 233-248). Sage Publications.
  • Iiyoshi, T., & Kumar, M. S. V. (2008). Opening up education: The collective advancement of education through open technology, open content, and open knowledge. MIT Press.
  • International Telecommunication Union (ITU). (2021). measuring digital development: Facts and figures 2021. ITU Publications.
  • Ito, M., Gutiérrez, K., Livingstone, S., Penuel, B., Rhodes, J., Salen, K., … & Watkins, S. C. (2013). Connected learning: An agenda for research and design. Digital Media and Learning Research Hub.
  • Kariyawasam, S. (2017). Sri Lanka: Historical perspectives on education and development. In J. Zajda & K. Rust (Eds.), Education and Development in the Global Era (pp. 155-172). Springer.
  • Kim, J. (2019). Digital transformation in education: Case studies from Asia and the Pacific. Springer.
  • Laurillard, D. (2008a). Digital technologies and their role in achieving our ambitions for education. Institute of Education, University of London.
  • Laurillard, D. (2008b) ‘Technology-enhanced learning as a tool for pedagogical innovation’, Journal of Philosophy of Education, 42(3-4), pp. 521-533.
  • Lee, S., & Choi, B. (2016) ‘The role of collaborative learning in enhancing virtual learning environments in South Korean higher education’, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 53(3), pp. 305-316.
  • Maul, A., Elfring, L., & Fensham, P. (2017) ‘Understanding the effects of digital technology on the structure of classrooms’, Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 26(5), pp. 559-573.
  • Ministry of Education. (2018). Digital technologies and the New Zealand Curriculum. New Zealand Government.
  • Ministry of Education. (2020). The National Education Policy Framework for Sri Lanka 2020- 2030. Government of Sri Lanka.
  • Nikolic, S., Morris, J., & Smith, K. (2019) ‘blended learning design: Five key ingredients’, Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(2), pp. 73-86.
  • Prensky, M. (2001) ‘Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1’, On the Horizon, 9(5), pp. 1-6.
  • Schuller, T., Preston, J., Hammond, C., Brassett-Grundy, A., & Bynner, J. (2004). The Benefits of Learning: The Impact of Education on Health, Family Life, and Social Capital. Routledge.
  • Selwyn, N. (2016). Is technology good for education? Wiley.
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.