FILMS AS PROTEST: TOWARDS EQUITABLE DISABILITY REPRESENTATION IN FILMS

Author: Dr Ngozi Marion Emmanuel

ABSTRACT

Films can contribute to disability advocacies through a critique of ableist attitudes and discriminations against disabled people. Film’s potentials are found in its popularity as a mass medium and its unique quality as a storytelling media combining moving pictures and sounds. Studies have found that films have predominantly represented disabilities stereotypically through tropes such as pity and tragedy, thereby misrecognizing disability identity (Norden, 1994; Safran, 1998; Black & Pretes, 2007). Other studies have found that the prevalence of using nondisabled actors to play disabled roles represents media injustice and inauthentic portrayal of disabilities (Ross, 1997; Siebers, 2016; Kuppers, 2007; Haller, 2019). This paper offers initial recommendations on the use of films as protest for disabled people in a time where disability identity and inclusion are more salient. Arising from workshops held with disabled people and filmmakers to co-produce knowledge on authentic representation, the recommendations in this paper reflect ways forward for inclusive disability representation on screen.

Keywords: Disabilities, films, protest, representation, people with disabilities, disability identity, and inclusion.

REFERENCES

  • Alamu, O. (2010). Narrative and style in Nigerian (Nollywood) films. African Study Monographs, 31(4), 163-171
  • Batty, C. (2011). Movies that move us: screenwriting and the power of the protagonist’s journey. Springer.
  • Baran, S. J., & Davis, D. K. (2012). Mass communication theory: foundations, ferment, and future (6th). Boston, Mass.: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
  • Barnes, C. (1992). Disabling imagery and the media. An Exploration of the Principles for Media Representations of Disabled People. The First in a Series of Reports. Halifax.
  • Barker, M., & Austin, T. (2000). From Antz to Titanic: Reinventing Film Analysis. Pluto Press.
  • Black, R. S., & Pretes, L. (2007). Victims and victors: Representation of physical disability on the silver screen. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 32(1), 66-83.
  • Bogdan, R. (2012). Picturing disability: Beggar, freak, citizen and other photographic rhetoric. Syracuse University Press.
  • Carroll, N. (1985). The specificity of media in the arts. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 19(4), 5-20.
  • Celli, C. (2016). National identity in global cinema: How movies explain the world. Springer.
  • Coogan, T. (2013). “Usually I love The Onion, but this time you’ve gone too far”: disability humour and transgression. Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies, 7(1), 1-17.
  • Danforth, S., & Rhodes, W. C. (1997). Deconstructing disability: A philosophy for inclusion. Remedial and special education, 18(6), 357-366.
  • DeMello, M. (2013). Body studies: An introduction. Routledge.
  • Dewsbury∗, G., Clarke, K., Randall, D., Rouncefield, M., & Sommerville, I. (2004). The anti‐social model of disability. Disability & society, 19(2), 145-158.
  • England, H. (2018). A History of Disability: from 1050 to the Present Day. Accessed from A History of Disability: from 1050 to the Present Day | Historic England.
  • Erickson, J. (1990). The body as the object of modern performance. Journal of Dramatic Theory and Criticism, 231-246.
  • Etieyibo, E., & Omiegbe, O. (2017). Disabilities in Nigeria: Attitudes, reactions, and remediation. Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Farley, A. P. (1997). The black body as fetish object. Or. L. Rev., 76, 457.
  • Foucault, M. (1977) `Nietzsche, Genealogy and History’, pp. 139-164 in D. Bouchard (ed.) Language, Counter-Memory, Practice. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • French, S., & Swain, J. (2004). Whose tragedy?: Towards a personal non-tragedy view of disability. London, UK: Sage.
  • Gallagher, G. W. (2008). Causes Won, Lost, and Forgotten: How Hollywood and Popular Art Shape What We Know about the Civil War. Univ of North Carolina Press.
  • Gerbner, G. (1998). Cultivation analysis: An overview. Mass communication and society, 1(3-4), 175-194.
  • Green, K., & Tanner, S. (2008). Reporting disability. Asia Pacific Media Educator, (19), 43-54.
  • Groce, N., & McGeown, J. (2013). Witchcraft, Wealth and Disability: Reinterpretation of a folk belief in contemporary urban Africa. Leonard Cheshire Disability and Inclusive Development Centre Working Paper Series, (30).
  • Goethals, T., Mortelmans, D., Van den Bulck, H., Van den Heurck, W., & Van Hove, G. (2020). I am not your metaphor: frames and counter-frames in the representation of disability. Disability & Society, 1-19.
  • Haller, B. (2019). Authentic disability representation on US television past and present. In The Routledge companion to disability and media (pp. 88-100). Routledge.
  • Haller, B., & Preston, J. (2016). Confirming normalcy:‘Inspiration porn’ and the construction of the disabled subject?. In Disability and social media (pp. 63-78). Routledge.
  • Hayes, M., & Black, R. (2003). Troubling signs: Disability, Hollywood movies and the construction of a discourse of pity. Disability Studies Quarterly, 23(2).
  • Herndon, A. (2002). Disparate but disabled: Fat embodiment and disability studies. Nwsa Journal, 120-137.
  • Holton, A. E., Farrell, L. C., & Fudge, J. L. (2014). A threatening space?: Stigmatization and the framing of autism in the news. Communication Studies, 65(2), 189-207.
  • Ingerslev, L. R. (2013). My body as an object: self-distance and social experience. Phenomenology and the cognitive sciences, 12(1), 163-178.
  • Kama, A. (2004). Supercrips versus the pitiful handicapped: Reception of disabling images by disabled audience members.
  • Kuppers, P. (2007). The wheelchair’s rhetoric: The performance of disability. The Drama Review, 51(4), 80-88.
  • Latour, B. (2004). How to talk about the body? The normative dimension of science studies. Body & society, 10(2-3), 205-229.
  • Lord, J. E., Stein, M. A., & Fiala-Butora, J. (2014). Facilitating an equal right to vote for persons with disabilities. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 6(1), 115-139.
  • Metzler, I. (2013). A social history of disability in the middle ages: Cultural considerations of physical impairment. Routledge.
  • Miller, J. (2011). The body in question. Random House.
  • Mitchell, D. T., & Snyder, S. L. (1997). The body and physical difference: Discourses of disability. University of Michigan Press.
  • Monaco, J., & Lindroth, D. (2000). How to read a film: the world of movies, media, and multimedia: language, history, theory. Oxford University Press, USA.
  • Njung, G. N. (2020). Amputated Men, Colonial Bureaucracy, and Masculinity in Post–World
  • War I Colonial Nigeria. Journal of Social History, 53(3), 620-643.
  • Norden, M. F. (1994). The cinema of isolation: A history of physical disability in the movies. Rutgers University Press.
  • Ørngreen, R., & Levinsen, K. T. (2017). Workshops as a research methodology. Electronic Journal of E-learning, 15(1), 70-81.
  • O’keeffe, A. N. N. E. (2006). Investigating media discourse. Routledge.
  • Olaiya, K. (2013). Commodifying the “Sacred,” Beatifying the “Abnormal”: Nollywood and the Representation of Disability. The Global South, 7(1), 137-156.
  • Oliver, M. (2013). The social model of disability: Thirty years on. Disability & society, 28(7), 1024-1026.
  • Pearman, T. V. (2010). ‘O Sweete Venym Queynte!’: Pregnancy and the Disabled Female Body in the Merchant’s Tale. Disability in the middle Ages: Reconsiderations and Reverberations, 25-37.
  • Riley, C. A. (2005). Disability and the media: Prescriptions for change. UPNE.
  • Richardson, N., & Locks, A. (2014). Body studies: The basics. Routledge.
  • Rodan, D., & Ellis, K. (2016). Disability, obesity and ageing: Popular media identifications.Routledge
  • Rohwerder, B. (2018) Disability Stigma in Developing Countries. K4D Helpdesk Report. Brighton, UK: Institute of Development Studies.
  • Ross, K. (1997). But where’s me in it? Disability, broadcasting and the audience. Media, Culture & Society, 19(4), 669-677.
  • Safran, S. P. (1998). The first century of disability portrayal in film: An analysis of the literature. The Journal of Special Education, 31(4), 467-479.
  • Samsel, M., & Perepa, P. (2013). The impact of media representation of disabilities on teachers’ perceptions. Support for Learning, 28(4), 138-145.
  • Scott, I. (2000). American politics in Hollywood film. Psychology Press.
  • Schur, L., Kruse, D., & Blanck, P. (2013). People with disabilities: Sidelined or mainstreamed?. Cambridge University Press.
  • Schwartz, D., Blue, E., McDonald, M., Giuliani, G., Weber, G., Seirup, H., … & Perkins, A. (2010). Dispelling stereotypes: Promoting disability equality through film. Disability & Society, 25(7), 841-848.
  • Shakespeare, T. (1999). Joking a part. Body & Society, 5(4), 47-52.
  • Shaw, D. (2006). Journey making group workshops as a research tool. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 57, 830-841.
  • Shilling, C. (2007). Sociology and the body: Classical traditions and new agendas. The sociological review, 55, 1-18.
  • Siebers, T. (2016). Disability on the Stage. Body aesthetics, 141.
  • Smedema, S. M., Ebener, D., & Grist-Gordon, V. (2012). The impact of humorous media on attitudes toward persons with disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation, 34(17), 1431-1437.
  • Söder, M. (1989). Disability as a social construct: the labelling approach revisited. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 4(2), 117-129.
  • Stramondo, J. A. (2010). How an ideology of pity is a social harm to people with disabilities. Social Philosophy Today, 26, 121-134.
  • Talmon, M., & Peleg, Y. (Eds.). (2011). Israeli cinema: identities in motion. University of Texas Press.
  • Weimann, G. (1999). Communicating unreality: Modern media and the reconstruction of reality. Sage Publications.
  • Williams, V. (2017). Learning disability policy and practice: changing lives?. Bloomsbury Publishing.
  • World Bank. (2020). Disability Inclusion in Nigeria: A Rapid Assessment. World Bank Group.
  • Yan, F. (2020). Image, reality and media construction. Springer Singapore.
  • Yazbak, F. E. (2004). Autism seems to be increasing worldwide, if not in London. BMJ, 328(7433), 226-227.
  • Young, S. (2014). Inspiration porn and the objectification of disability. TEDxSydney. Retrieved from http://tedxsydney. Com/site/item. cfm.
  • Young, L. S. (2012). Awareness with accuracy: An analysis of the representation of autism in film and television. Research Papers, 256.
  • Zhang, L., & Haller, B. (2013). Consuming image: How mass media impact the identity of people with disabilities. Communication Quarterly, 61(3), 319-334.