ADMINISTRATIVE RELATIONS, RESOURCE MOBILIZATION, AND SERVICE DELIVERY IN KENYAN COUNTIES

Authors: Dedan Luvaga & Mfonka Abdoulaye

ABSTRACT

The constitution of Kenya 2010 sets a point of departure in intergovernmental relations. It brings about the national government and counties, thus a two-level government system in Kenya. Articles 6(2) and 189 emphasize that the two levels of government must consult, cooperate, and coordinate instead of competing under a cooperative form of devolution. However, lack of consultation, minimal cooperation, and inadequate coordination results in competition and supremacy battles on resource allocation and utilization. This jeopardizes a cooperative modus operandi of devolution. This paper evaluates Kenyan counties’ administrative relations, resource mobilization, and service delivery. It is underpinned by the Resource Mobilization Theory (RMT) by Zald & McCarthy (1977).

A cross-sectional design is used since it relies on questionnaires, structured interviews, and observations to gather data. A survey research strategy is applied, and a mixed method that integrates qualitative and quantitative data components is used at both the data collection and analysis stages. Data is collected from multiple groups of respondents: the national and county governments, the Ministry of Devolution and Planning, and the general public. A sample of 400 is used to gather quantitative data using questionnaires, while qualitative data is collected via structured interviews from a sample of 16 key informants. The quantitative and qualitative data are analyzed using SPSS and deductive thematic analysis, respectively.

The general results show that if administrative relations are altered by 1%, the overall delivery of services will shift by 30.6%, indicating that administrative relations positively affect service delivery within the county governments in Kenya. Administrative relations enhance strategic management within counties, as indicated by 63.6% respondent approval, and enhance performance and resource management in counties with a (56.4%) approval rate. On the contrary, 61.1% of respondents relate to battling inequalities, while (64.1%) criticized that democratic values and trust among citizens and leaders have not yet been attained. The study concludes that counties and the national government have failed to reflect positively on the pivotal principles of democracy, such as citizen participation, political tolerance, equality, transparency, and accountability that drive effective administrative relations. Despite these results, the paper recommends addressing decision-making, recruitment, and contractual autonomy in counties.

Keywords: Administrative relations, Resource mobilization, Service delivery Administrative Relations, Resource Mobilization, and Service Delivery in Kenyan Counties.

REFERENCES

  • Basias, N. and Pollalis, Y., (2018). Quantitative and qualitative research in business & technology: Justifying a suitable research methodology. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 7, pp.91-105.
  • Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods. Oxford University Press.
  • CBK (2023). Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2022/2023. Obtained from: https://www.centralbank.go.ke/uploads/cbk_annual_reports/1424452432_2023%20Annual%20Report.pdf
  • Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach. Sage publications.
  • de Arimateia da Cruz, J., & Kohler da Cruz, B. (2010). The United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC). In Law Enforcement Executive Forum (Vol. 10, No. 4, p. 187).
  • Donald, M. K., Guyo, W., & Moronge, M. (2020). Contribution of Administrative and Fiscal Relations on Service Delivery in County Governments of Kenya. International Journal of Innovative Development and Policy Studies, 8(3), 10-29.
  • Edwards, B. & Kane, M. (2014) “Resource mobilization and social and political movements.” In: van der Heijden, H. A., (ed.) Handbook of Political Citizenship and Social Movements. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp 202-232.
  • Githinji, R. K., Mwaniki, M., Kirwa, K. J., & Mutongwa, S. M. (2014). Information and communication technology (ICT) on revenue collection by Kenyan Counties. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 4(11), 238-260.
  • Hujo, K., & Bangura, Y. (2020). The politics of domestic resource mobilization for social development: An introduction. The politics of domestic resource mobilization for social development, 1-37.
  • Kamiri, M. W. & Kihara, A. (2018). Factors Influencing Effective Implementation of Strategic Plans in County Governments in Kenya, A Case of Kiambu County Government. International Journal of Strategic Management, 7(5), 60-77.
  • Kalogiannidis, S. (2021). Role of revenue mobilization in the growth and development of economy: a case analysis of Greece. Research in World Economy, 12(2), 63-76.
  • Karama, F. B. (2021). Determinants of Delivery of Devolved Services in Selected Counties in Kenya (Doctoral dissertation, JKUAT-COHRED).
  • Koy, T. (2019). The Rio Declaration on Environment and Development. In The ‘Earth Summit ‘Agreements: A Guide and Assessment (pp. 85-96). Routledge.
  • Lumumba, P. L., & Franceschi, L. G. (2014). The Constitution of Kenya, 2010: An Introductory Commentary. Strathmore University Press.
  • Manyala, D. K. (2021). Role of Inter-Governmental Relations on Service Delivery in Multi-level Systems of Governance in Counties in Kenya (Doctoral dissertation, JKUAT-COHRED).
  • Muriu, A. R. (2013). Decentralization, citizen participation, and local public service delivery: A study on the nature and influence of citizen participation on decentralized service delivery in Kenya (Master’s thesis, Potsdam: Universitätsverlag Potsdam).
  • Muthui, A. K. (2016). Factors Influencing Service Delivery in County Governments in Kenya; A Study of County Government of Kitui (Doctoral dissertation, Kca University).
  • Muwonge, A., Williamson, T. S., Owuor, C., & Kinuthia, M. (2022). Making devolution work for service delivery in Kenya. World Bank Publications.
  • National Council for Law Reporting (2012). IGRs Act 2012. Obtained from https://faolex.fao.org/docs/pdf/ken121993.pdf
  • National Council for Law Reporting (2010). The Constitution of Kenya 2010. Obtained from https://faolex.fao.org/docs/pdf/ken127322.pdf
  • Ngigi, S., & Busolo, D. N. (2019). Devolution in Kenya: the good, the bad and the ugly. Public Policy and Administration Research, 9(6), 9-21.
  • Nworji, O.C., (2021). ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE AND EMPLOYEE’S JOB PERFORMANCE. MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF VOCATIONAL EDUCATION & RESEARCH, 1(4).
  • Olatona, J. B., & Olomola, P. A. (2015). Analysis of fiscal decentralization and public service delivery in Nigeria. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 6(9).
  • ONYALO, P. O. (2021). The Decentralised Governance in Kenya: Implications on Citizen Participation in Local Governance. European Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 4(4), 22–39. https://doi.org/10.33422/ejbs.v4i4.692
  • Opiyo, S., Guyo, W., Moronge, M., & Otieno, R. O. (2017). Role of Conflict Management as an Essential Element of Public Participation in Enhancing Performance of Devolved Governance Systems in Kenya.
  • Oyinlola, M. A., Adedeji, A. A., Bolarinwa, M. O., & Olabisi, N. (2020). Governance, domestic resource mobilization, and inclusive growth in sub-Saharan Africa. Economic Analysis and Policy, 65, 68-88.
  • Roy, S. (2015). Decentralization: Concept, Types and Objectives. PANCHAKOTesSAYS (ISSN: 2394-5656), 5(1).
  • Schober, P., Boer, C., & Schwarte, L. A. (2018). Correlation coefficients: appropriate use and interpretation. Anesthesia & analgesia, 126(5), 1763-1768.
  • Ubisi, S. V. (2017). Provision of adequate housing through cooperative government and intergovernmental relations: The case of Bushbuckridge Local Municipality (BLM). Pretoria: University of South Africa.
  • Wagana, D. M. (2017). Effect of governance decentralization on service delivery in county governments in Kenya (Doctoral dissertation, COHRED, JKUAT).
  • Wagana, D. M., Iravo, M. A., Nzulwa, J. D., & Kihoro, J. M. (2017). The moderating effects of E-Government on the relationship between administrative decentralization and service delivery in county governments in Kenya.
  • Yusuf, H. A., Shittu, W. O., Akanbi, S. B., Umar, H. M., & Abdulrahman, I. A. (2020). The role of foreign direct investment, financial development, democracy, and political (in) stability on economic growth in West Africa. International Trade, Politics and Development, 4(1), 27-46.
  • Zald, M. N. & McCarthy, J. D., (1987). Social Movements in an Organizational Society. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books. _____. 2002. “The Resource Mobilization Research Program: Progress, Challenge, and Transformation.” In: New Directions in Contemporary Social Theory. Berger, J. & Zelditch, M. (eds). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 147-171.