International Journal of Social Sciences and Management Review

EXPLORING THE ROLE OF IMPLICIT BIAS IN HIRING DECISIONS: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF PRIVATE BANKS IN SAGAR DISTRICT

Authors: Mrs. Chetna Raikwar* & Dr. Suneet Walia

ABSTRACT

Implicit bias in recruitment continues to challenge efforts toward equitable and inclusive hiring practices, impacting candidate evaluation and overall workplace diversity. This paper presents a systematic review of peer-reviewed literature and an empirical analysis of implicit bias in hiring, examining how unconscious biases shape candidate selection, hinder diversity, and reinforce structural inequalities. The study employs a mixed-methods approach, incorporating structured surveys and regression analysis to measure the impact of gender, race, age, and affinity bias on hiring decisions within private banks in Sagar District. Findings indicate that structured interviews and blind recruitment can partially reduce bias; however, the pervasive nature of implicit attitudes underscores the need for ongoing research and adaptive organizational practices. The study identifies key gaps in existing literature and proposes future research directions to enhance understanding and inform more effective interventions. By providing actionable insights and strategic recommendations, this paper aims to support HR professionals and organizations in cultivating fairer recruitment practices and fostering diverse and inclusive workplaces.

Keywords – Implicit bias, Recruitment bias, Unconscious bias, Diversity, Hiring practices

REFERENCES

• Bertrand, M., & Mullainathan, S. (2004). Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination. The American Economic Review, 94(4), 991–1013. https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828042002561
• Devine, P. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.56.1.5
• Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Eubanks, V. (2018). Automating inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. St. Martin’s Press.
• Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., & Glick, P. (2002). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(2), 77–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(02)00021-6
• Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition(2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
• Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102(1), 4–27. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.102.1.4
• Kite, M. E., & Johnson, B. T. (1988). Attitudes toward older and younger adults: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 328–350. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.328
• Moss-Racusin, C. A., Dovidio, J. F., Brescoll, V. L., Graham, M. J., & Handelsman, J. (2012). Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students. *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109*(41), 16474–16479. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1211286109
• Oliver, M. (1996). Understanding disability: From theory to practice. Macmillan.
• Posthuma, R. A., & Campion, M. A. (2009). Age stereotypes in the workplace: Common stereotypes, moderators, and future research directions. *Journal of Management, 35(1), 158–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308318617
• Stone, D. L., & Colella, A. (1996). A model of factors affecting the treatment of disabled individuals in organizations. *Academy of Management Review, 21(2), 352–386. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1996.9605060212
• Purkiss, S. L. S., Perrewé, P. L., Gillespie, T. L., Mayes, B. T., & Ferris, G. R. (2006). Implicit sources of bias in employment interview judgments and decisions. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 101(2), 152-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.06.005
• Bertrand, M., & Mullainathan, S. (2004). Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination. American Economic Review, 94(4), 991–1013. https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828042002561
• Quillian, L., Pager, D., Hexel, O., & Midtbøen, A. H. (2017). Meta-analysis of field experiments shows no change in racial discrimination in hiring over time. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(41), 10870–10875. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1706255114
• Eaton, A. A., Saunders, J. F., Jacobson, R. K., & West, K. (2019). How gender and race stereotypes impact the advancement of scholars in STEM: Professors’ biased evaluations of physics and biology post-doctoral candidates. Sex Roles, 82(3–4), 127–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-01052-w
• Forscher, P. S., Lai, C. K., Axt, J. R., Ebersole, C. R., Herman, M., Devine, P. G., & Nosek, B. A. (2019). A meta-analysis of procedures to change implicit measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117(3), 522–559. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000160
• Binns, R. (2020). A systematic review of discrimination and fairness by algorithmic decision-making. Philosophy & Technology, 33(4), 553–558. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-020-00438-6
• Hodson, G., Dovidio, J. F., & Gaertner, S. L. (2002). Processes in racial discrimination: Differential weighting of conflicting information. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(4), 460–471. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202287004
• Rooth, D. O. (2010). Automatic associations and discrimination in hiring: Real-world evidence. Labour Economics, 17(3), 523–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2009.04.005
• Carlsson, M., & Rooth, D. O. (2007). Evidence of ethnic discrimination in the Swedish labor market using experimental data. Labour Economics, 14(4), 716–729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2007.05.001
• Pager, D., & Western, B. (2012). Identifying discrimination at work: The use of field experiments. Journal of Social Issues, 68(2), 221–237. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2012.01746.x
• Kang, S. K., DeCelles, K. A., Tilcsik, A., & Jun, S. (2016). Whitened résumés: Race and self-presentation in the labor market. Administrative Science Quarterly, 61(3), 469–502. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839216639577
• Derous, E., & Ryan, A. M. (2019). When your resume is (not) turning you down: Modality effects on resume screening. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 27(1), 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12241
• Gaddis, S. M. (2015). Discrimination in the credential society: An audit study of race and college selectivity in the labor market. Social Forces, 93(4), 1451–1479. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sou111
• Neumark, D. (2018). Experimental research on labor market discrimination. Journal of Economic Literature, 56(3), 799–866. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20161309
• Baert, S. (2018). Hiring discrimination: An overview of (almost) all correspondence experiments since 2005. In D. Gaddis (Ed.), Audit Studies: Behind the Scenes with Theory, Method, and Nuance (pp. 63–77). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71153-9_4
• Zschirnt, E., & Ruedin, D. (2016). Ethnic discrimination in hiring decisions: A meta-analysis of correspondence tests 1990–2015. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 42(7), 1115–1134. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2015.1133279
• Bertrand, M., Chugh, D., & Mullainathan, S. (2005). Implicit discrimination. American Economic Review, 95(2), 94–98. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282805774670365
• Pager, D., Western, B., & Bonikowski, B. (2009). Discrimination in a low-wage labor market: A field experiment. American Sociological Review, 74(5), 777–799. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240907400505
• Agan, A., & Starr, S. (2018). Ban the box, criminal records, and racial discrimination: A field experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 133(1), 191–235. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjx028
• Oreopoulos, P. (2011). Why do skilled immigrants struggle in the labor market? A field experiment with thirteen thousand resumes. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 3(4), 148–171. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.3.4.148
• Guryan, J., & Charles, K. K. (2013). Taste-based or statistical discrimination: The economics of discrimination returns to its roots. The Economic Journal, 123(572), F417–F432. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12023
• Greenwald, A. G., & Pettigrew, T. F. (2014). With malice toward none and charity for some: Ingroup favoritism enables discrimination. American Psychologist, 69(7), 669-684. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036056