COLLABORATIVE WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT IN SUB-SAHARIAN AFRICA: THE CASE OF MAMFE, SOUTHWEST CAMEROON – International Journal of Social Sciences and Management Review

COLLABORATIVE WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT IN SUB-SAHARIAN AFRICA: THE CASE OF MAMFE, SOUTHWEST CAMEROON

Authors: Maruh Oben Enoh, Clarkson Wanie Mvo & Sop Sop Maturin Desire

ABSTRACT

This study examines collaborative water resources management in Mamfe Sub-division, exploring the complex interplay of stakeholder engagement, collaborative frameworks, and institutional dynamics. Through field research conducted in 2024, including surveys of 210 respondents and field observations, the study analyses existing water resources, stakeholder roles, and collaborative mechanisms. Findings reveal diverse water resources with boreholes (91.7%), wells (75%), and streams (73.3%) being predominant. While 66.7% of respondents confirm active collaboration among stakeholders, significant challenges persist in institutional coordination and information sharing. Traditional institutions demonstrate the highest effectiveness in water resources management (46.7%), while weak policy implementation (63.3%) and inadequate finances (58.3%) emerges as primary barriers to collaboration. The study concludes that successful water management in Mamfe requires integrating traditional practices with modern techniques, supported by adequate financial resources and improved institutional coordination.

Keywords: Water resources management, stakeholder collaboration, institutional coordination, traditional authorities, sustainability

REFERENCES

Biswas, A. K. (2008). Integrated water resources management: Is it working? International Journal of Water Resources Development, 24(1), 5-22.
Cleaver, F., & de Koning, J. (2015); Furthering critical institutionalism. International Journal of the Commons, 9(1), 1-18.
International Water Association (IWA); (2014): An Avoidable Crisis: WASH Human Resource Capacity Gaps in 15 Developing Economies. London: IWA.
Lautze, J., de Silva, S., Giordano, M., & Sanford, L. (2011); putting the cart before the horse: Water governance and IWRM. Natural Resources Forum, 35(1), 1-8.
Meinzen-Dick, R. (2007); Beyond panaceas in water institutions Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(39), 15200-15205.
Pahl-Wostl, C. (2009). A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes. Global Environmental Change, 19(3), 354-365.
Pahl-Wostl, C., Lebel, L., Knieper, C., & Nikitina, E. (2013); from applying panaceas to mastering complexity: Toward adaptive water governance in river basins. Environmental Science & Policy, 23, 24-34.
Pahl-Wostl, C., Sendzimir, J., Jeffrey, P., Aerts, J., Berkamp, G., & Cross, K. (2007). Managing change toward adaptive water management through social learning. Ecology and Society, 12(2), 30.
Reed, M. S. (2008). Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review. Biological Conservation, 141(10), 2417-2431.
Tortajada, C. (2010). Water governance: Some critical issues. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 26(2), 297-307.