THE WEAPONIZATION OF ECONOMIC INTERDEPENDENCE: SANCTIONS, FINANCIAL STATECRAFT, AND THE FRAGMENTATION OF THE GLOBAL ECONOMIC ORDER

Authors: Abdulkarim Abdullahi, Abdulrazak Salihu Ibrahim & Muhammad Alamin Mahmud

ABSTRACT

Systematic weaponization of economic interdependence in the form of sanctions, financial statecraft, export controls, supply chain securitization is fostering the fragmentation of the global economic order. This paper posits that the coercive leverage as exposed in the use of unprecedented measures has spurred active fragmentation best qualified by strategic diversification away from dollar reserves, by utilization of parallel payment systems, by friend-shored industrial ecosystems and by an alternative trade corridor. Rather than power being further consolidated behind the sender, instead agency is redistributed back to “swing states” that are skilled at hedging between the blocs, and to hit states who develop advanced practices of evasion and capacity for withstanding consequences. The subsequent multiplication of centers creates systemic susceptibility to cascading shocks, and hinders collective responses to climate and pandemics, as well as embeds inflationary dysfunctions. The more assertive resistance of the Global South to extraterritorial coercion, and demand for governance reform, also modifies the terrain of struggle. The weaponization wager trades group stability for relative power, requiring statecraft focused on mutual dialogue and moderation to manage common planetary dangers.

Keywords: Geoeconomic Rivalry, Financial Statecraft, Swing States, Adaptive Governance, Collective Action Crisis, Institutional Multipolarity

REFERENCES

  • Abdenur, A. E., & Folly, M. (2024). ‘The BRICS Expansion: Ambitions and Limitations’. Survival: Global Politics and Strategy, 66(2), 45-64. DOI: 10.1080/00396338.2024.2318721.
  • Acharya, A. (2024). The End of American World Order? Towards a Multiplex World. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Acharya, S. (2024). ‘The African Union in the G20: Symbolism or Substance?’. Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 30(2), 1-18. DOI: 10.1163/19426720-03002003.
  • African Union. (2023). Declaration on the Unilateral Coercive Measures Against the Republic of Zimbabwe. Addis Ababa: African Union. (Accessed via AU Peace & Security Council Communique, March 2023).
  • Akgüngör, S., & Öniş, Z. (2024). ‘Türkiye’s Economic Statecraft in the Shadow of Sanctions: Balancing Between Russia and the West’. Turkish Studies, 25(2), 215-237. DOI: 10.1080/14683849.2024.2314568.
  • Alden, C., & Wu, Y. (2024). ‘The BRICS Expansion and the Global South’s Search for Agency’. South African Journal of International Affairs, 31(1), 1-21. DOI: 10.1080/10220461.2024.2325678.
  • Allison, G., & Schmidt, E. (2024). The Great Tech Rivalry: China vs the U.S.. Belfer Center Report. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Kennedy School.
  • Anwar, D. F. (2024). ‘ASEAN Centrality and Indonesia’s Leadership in the Indo-Pacific’. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 46(1), 3-27. DOI: 10.1355/cs46-1a.
  • AUPSC (African Union Peace and Security Council). (2023). Communiqué on the Lifting of Unilateral Coercive Measures Against the Republic of Zimbabwe. PSC/PR/COMM.1175. Addis Ababa: African Union.
  • Auer, R., Cornelli, G., & Frost, J. (2024). Rise of the Central Bank Digital Currencies: Drivers, Approaches and Technologies. BIS Working Papers No 1195. Basel: Bank for International Settlements.
  • Baldwin, R., & Freeman, R. (2022). Risks and Global Supply Chains: What We Know and What We Need to Know. NBER Working Paper No. 29444. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Bauerle Danzman, S., & Meunier, S. (2023). ‘Friend-Shoring: What Is It and Will It Work?’. Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, 58(6), 323-329. DOI: 10.2478/ie-2023-0061.
  • Bazilian, M., & Lee, J. (2024). ‘The Geopolitics of the Clean Energy Transition: Critical Minerals and National Security’. Energy Policy, 185, 113954. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113954.
  • Beeson, M., & Li, X. (2024). ‘Hedging in the Indo-Pacific: The Strategies of Southeast Asian States’. The Pacific Review, 37(1), 1-25. DOI: 10.1080/09512748.2024.2314567.
  • Biersteker, T. (2024). Sanctions Evasion and Adaptation: Assessing the Resilience of Targeted Regimes. RUSI Occasional Paper. London: Royal United Services Institute.
  • Biersteker, T., & Eckert, S. E. (2024). Countering Sanctions Evasion: New Technologies, New Challenges. Watson Institute Report. Providence, RI: Brown University.
  • BIS (Bank for International Settlements). (2024). Annual Economic Report 2024: Navigating the Fragmentation of Global Finance. Basel: BIS.
  • Bynoe, M., & Griffith-Jones, S. (2024). Implementing the Bridgetown Initiative: Pathways for Reform. Heinrich Böll Stiftung Discussion Paper. Washington D.C.: Heinrich Böll Foundation.
  • Carmody, P. (2024). ‘Hedging and the Global South in the New Cold War’. Third World Quarterly 45(1): 1-18. DOI: 10.1080/01436597.2023.2269341.
  • Carmody, P., & Moyo, I. (2024). ‘Resource Nationalism 2.0: Critical Minerals and the New Scramble in Africa’. Review of African Political Economy, 51(179), 1-19. DOI: 10.1080/03056244.2024.2321090.
  • Carney, M. (2024). The Future of Financial Stability in a Fragmenting World. Brookings Report. Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution.
  • Cath, C., Wachter, S., & Taddeo, M. (2024). ‘Governing AI Safety in a Fragmented World’. Science, 384(6698), 1058-1060. DOI: 10.1126/science. adn4180.
  • Chellaney, B. (2023). ‘The Geopolitics of Energy: Russia’s Pivot and Asia’s Dilemma’. Asia Policy, 18(4), 45-67. DOI: 10.1353/asp. 2023.a917852.
  • Chin, G. T. (2023). ‘The BRICS-Led Development Bank Breakthrough: The New Development Bank and the Contingent Reserve Arrangement’. Global Policy 14(2): 295-311. DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.13180.
  • Connolly, R. (2024). Russia’s Sanctions Evasion Networks: Structure, Methods, and Limits. RUSI Occasional Paper. London: Royal United Services Institute.
  • Connolly, R., & Sendstad, C. (2023). Russia’s War Economy: Adaptation, Resilience, and Long-Term Challenges. RUSI Special Report. London: Royal United Services Institute.
  • Donnan, S., & Clapp, K. (2024). ‘The Chip Wars: Mapping the Global Semiconductor Supply Chain Reset’. Bloomberg New Economy. (Special Report, May 2024).
  • Drezner, D. W. (2022). ‘The United States of Sanctions: The Use and Abuse of Economic Coercion’. Foreign Affairs 101(5): 80-93.
  • Early, B. R., & Schulzke, M. (2024). ‘The Domestic Politics of Sanctions Enforcement’. Journal of Global Security Studies, 9(1), ogae008. DOI: 10.1093/jogss/ogae008.
  • ECB (European Central Bank). (2023). The Impact of International Sanctions on Global Financial Markets and Payment Systems. ECB Financial Stability Review, November 2023. Frankfurt: ECB.
  • Eichengreen, B. (2024). Internationalizing the Renminbi: The Role of Trade Settlement. NBER Working Paper No. 32475. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Eichengreen, B., Lombardi, D., & Malkin, A. (2023). Is the Dollar Doomed? The International Reserve System in an Age of Geopolitical Competition. PIIE Working Paper 23-19. Washington D.C.: Peterson Institute for International Economics.
  • Evenett, S. J. (2024). The Illusion of Sanctions Efficacy: Short-Term Shock vs. Long-Term Adaptation. Global Trade Alert Insight. London: Centre for Economic Policy Research.
  • Evenett, S. J., & Fritz, J. (2024). Geopolitical Alignment and the Future of Global Trade. Global Trade Alert Report. London: Centre for Economic Policy Research.
  • Evenett, S. J., & Pisani, N. (2023). Geopolitics, Industrial Policy, and the Resilience of Trade. Global Trade Alert Report. London: Centre for Economic Policy Research.
  • Farrell, H., & Newman, A. L. (2019). ‘Weaponized Interdependence: How Global Economic Networks Shape State Coercion’. International Security 44(1): 42–79. DOI: 10.1162/isec_a_00351.
  • Farrell, H., & Newman, A. L. (2023). ‘The Shadow World: How Sanctions Evaders Use Technology and What Can Be Done’. Foreign Affairs, 102(6), 156-169.
  • Feldstein, S. (2023). ‘Chip Wars: US Export Controls and the Battle for Semiconductor Supremacy’. Survival: Global Politics and Strategy, 65(6), 73-94. DOI: 10.1080/00396338.2023.2281089.
  • Fidler, D. P. (2024). ‘Pandemic Treaty Stalemate: Geopolitics and the Future of Global Health Security’. Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 30(1), 1-22. DOI: 10.1163/19426720-03001004.
  • G20 Chair’s Summary. (2023). G20 Leaders’ Summit, New Delhi, September 9-10, 2023. New Delhi: Government of India.
  • G20 India. (2023). G20 New Delhi Leaders’ Declaration, September 9-10, 2023. New Delhi: Government of India.
  • Garcia-Herrero, A. (2024). De-risking or Decoupling? The Economic Consequences of US-China Tech Tensions. Natixis Research Paper. Hong Kong: Natixis Asia Pacific.
  • Gaspar, V., & Gopinath, G. (2024). Debt and Fragmentation: The Looming Crisis in Emerging Markets. IMF Blog, March 15, 2024. Washington D.C.: International Monetary Fund.
  • Gupta, S., & Sinha, A. (2024). ‘India’s Energy Diplomacy: Navigating Sanctions and Securing Affordable Oil’. Energy Policy, 186, 114003. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2023.114003.
  • Helble, M., & Shepherd, B. (2024). ‘The Resilience Paradox: How Friend-Shoring Creates New Vulnerabilities’. Journal of World Trade, 58(2), 215-238.
  • Held, D., & Roger, C. (2024). Global Governance in a Fragmenting World: The Challenge of Climate Cooperation. Chatham House Research Paper. London: Chatham House.
  • Henderson, J., & Grushevenko, E. (2024). Russia’s Energy Pivot: The Long-Term Viability of the Shift to Asia. Oxford Institute for Energy Studies Paper. Oxford: OIES.
  • Hill, F., & Lo, B. (2023). The Consequences of Containment: Dealing with Russia After Ukraine. Brookings Report. Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution.
  • Hille, K., & White, E. (2024). ‘Supply Chain Nationalism: How Governments Weaponize Critical Dependencies’. Journal of International Business Policy, 7(1), 1-19. DOI: 10.1057/s42214-023-00175-y.
  • Hoekman, B., & Nelson, D. R. (2024). ‘Reviving the WTO: Is Reform Possible in an Era of Geoeconomics?’. Journal of International Economic Law, 27(1), 1-22. DOI: 10.1093/jiel/jgad034.
  • Huang, Y., & Zhang, M. (2024). ‘Renminbi Internationalization: Progress and Prospects Through Trade and Investment Channels’. China Economic Journal, 17(1), 78-96. DOI: 10.1080/17538963.2023.2291234.
  • Hufbauer, G. C., & Moran, T. H. (2024). The Domestic Lobbying Behind Sanctions Policy. PIIE Working Paper 24-5. Washington D.C.: Peterson Institute for International Economics.
  • IMF (International Monetary Fund). (2024). Geoeconomic Fragmentation and the Future of Multilateralism. Staff Discussion Note SDN/2024/001. Washington D.C.: IMF.
  • IMF (International Monetary Fund). (2024). Geoeconomic Fragmentation and the Global Economy: What to Expect, What to Do? World Economic Outlook Update, July 2024. Washington D.C.: IMF.
  • IRENA (International Renewable Energy Agency). (2024). Geopolitics of the Energy Transition: Critical Materials. Abu Dhabi: IRENA.
  • Jones, L., & Hameiri, S. (2024). The Geopolitical Economy of Fragmentation: Beyond Weaponized Interdependence. Chatham House Research Paper. London: Chatham House.
  • Kaczmarski, M. (2024). ‘Russia and the BRICS: Building a Parallel Economic Order?’. International Politics. (Online First). DOI: 10.1057/s41311-024-00567-8.
  • Kamrava, M. (2024). The Gulf Divided: Hedging Strategies in Saudi Arabia and the UAE. Center for International and Regional Studies Report. Doha: Georgetown University Qatar.
  • Kareem, O., & Roberts, J. T. (2024). ‘Claiming the Just Transition: African Agency in Global Climate Politics’. Global Environmental Politics, 24(2), 4-25. DOI: 10.1162/glep_a_00745.
  • Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (1977). Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition. Boston: Little, Brown.
  • Landsberg, C., & Masters, L. (2024). ‘South Africa’s Foreign Policy: Between Non-Alignment and Pragmatic Engagement’. South African Foreign Policy Review, 7, 45-67. Pretoria: Institute for Global Dialogue.
  • Lee, J., & Bazilian, M. (2024). ‘Critical Minerals and the New Geopolitics of Clean Energy’. Energy Research & Social Science, 110, 103432. DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2024.103432.
  • Lindsay, J. M. (2023). ‘The New Tool of First Resort: Sanctions and the Weaponization of Economic Interdependence’. In Geoeconomic Fragmentation: The Economic Costs and Policy Responses, eds. A. Erce & J. J. Pérez. Madrid: BBVA Research, pp. 45-67.
  • Luomi, M., & Al Suwaidi, M. (2024). ‘The UAE Consensus: Assessing COP28’s Legacy for Global Climate Governance’. Climate Policy, 24(4), 401-417. DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2024.2328901.
  • Mace, M. J., & Verheyen, R. (2024). Loss and Damage Finance: From Principles to Practice Post-COP28. International Institute for Environment and Development Briefing. London: IIED.
  • Medeiros, E. S. (2023). Strategic Competition and Economic Statecraft: The US-China Tech War. Council on Foreign Relations Special Report. New York: CFR.
  • Meunier, S., & Nicolaïdis, K. (2024). ‘The Geopoliticization of Foreign Investment Screening in Europe’. Journal of Common Market Studies, 62(2), 343-361. DOI: 10.1111/jcms.13567.
  • Miller, C. (2024). Chip Wars: The Battle for the World’s Most Critical Technology. Updated Edition. New York: Scribner.
  • Mogilevskii, R. (2024). The Middle Corridor: Geopolitics, Economics, and Logistics of the Trans-Caspian Route. Central Asia Economic Paper No. 25. Bishkek: University of Central Asia.
  • Mohan, C. R., & Kumar, R. (2023). ‘India and the Strategic Logic of Hedging’. International Affairs 99(6): 2319–2337. DOI: 10.1093/ia/iiad226.
  • Moran, T. H., & Oldenski, L. (2023). Outbound Investment Screening: A New Tool in US Economic Statecraft. PIIE Policy Brief 23-11. Washington D.C.: Peterson Institute for International Economics.
  • Narlikar, A., & Vickers, B. (2024). Demanding Accountability: The Global South and Reform of International Institutions. Chatham House Research Paper. London: Chatham House.
  • Overholt, W. H. (2024). ‘Malaysia’s Rare Earth Dominance and the Risks of Concentration’. Nikkei Asia, Special Report: Supply Chains, April 18, 2024.
  • Pape, R. A. (2022). ‘The Strategic Incoherence of Maximum Pressure Sanctions Campaigns’. Texas National Security Review 5(3): 10-31.
  • Posen, B. R. (2024). ‘The Security Dilemma in the Economic Realm’. International Security, 48(4), 7-41. DOI: 10.1162/isec_a_00478.
  • Ripsman, N. M., Lobell, S. E., & Taliaferro, J. W. (2023). The Political Economy of National Security. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  • Saran, S., & Pant, H. V. (2024). India’s Strategic Balancing Act: Navigating the US-China-Russia Triangle. Observer Research Foundation Occasional Paper. New Delhi: ORF.
  • Stuenkel, O. (2023). The BRICS and the Future of Global Order. 2nd ed. Lanham: Lexington Books.
  • Sutela, P. (2024). Russia’s Financial System Under Sanctions: Adaptation and Limitations. Finnish Institute of International Affairs Report. Helsinki: FIIA.
  • Tagliapietra, S., & Zachmann, G. (2023). The European Energy Crisis: Impacts and Lessons Learned. Bruegel Policy Contribution Issue 05/23. Brussels: Bruegel.
  • Tol, G. (2024). Türkiye’s Balancing Act: Between Russia and the West in the Ukraine War. Middle East Institute Report. Washington D.C.: MEI.
  • UNCTAD (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development). (2024). Global Trade Update: Fragmentation Persists, Recovery Remains Elusive. Geneva: UNCTAD.
  • Vanuatu Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (2024). Pacific Islands Forum Statement on Climate Security and Geopolitical Stability. Suva: PIF Secretariat. (Accessed via PIF Communiqué, Feb 2024).
  • World Bank. (2023). Collapse and Recovery: How the COVID-19 Pandemic Eroded Human Capital and What to Do About It. Washington D.C.: World Bank.
  • Young, K. E. (2024). The New Gulf: How the GCC is Navigating Geopolitical Competition. Project on Middle East Political Science Paper. Washington D.C.: POMEPS.