INTEGRATED CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM (ICJS) TOWARDS A ZERO CRIME COMMUNITY IN INDONESIA

Author: Indira Santi Kertabudi

ABSTRACT

This study explores the concept and implementation of the Integrated Criminal Justice System (ICJS) as a systemic strategy to enhance efficiency, transparency, and preventive mechanisms within Indonesia’s criminal justice framework. ICJS integrates both preventive aspects such as the monitoring of financial flows (by the Financial Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre/PPATK), human mobility (Immigration), and goods traffic (Customs)and curative aspects, including the legal process from citizen reporting to court verdicts. Using a descriptive qualitative approach, the study identifies major challenges to integration, including institutional silos, lack of unified regulations, and disparities in technological capacity. Nonetheless, strategic opportunities such as digital governance initiatives, increasing public demand for transparency, and strong political commitment create favourable conditions for ICJS development. Findings suggest that inter-agency integration of processes and data holds significant potential for building a responsive, accountable, and adaptive criminal justice system. ICJS is positioned not only as a legal innovation, but also as a national strategy to advance a zero-crime community and restore public trust in the rule of law.

Keywords: Integrated Criminal Justice System, legal integration, crime prevention, public accountability, digital justice

BIBLIOGRAPHY

  • Amin, I. (2024). Penggunaan Pendekatan Integrated Criminal Justice System Dalam Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Narkotika Applying the Integrated Criminal Justice System Approach to the Criminalization of Narcotic Drugs. Jurnal Kompilasi Hukum Volume, 9(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29303/jkh.v9i1.172
  • Bernard, T. J., Paoline, E. A., & Pare, P. (2018). General systems theory and criminal justice General systems theory and criminal justice. Journal of Criminal Justice, 33(February), 203–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2005.02.001
  • Brandon C. Welsh, G. M. Z. & S. N. Z. (2019). The Centrality of Theory in Modern Day Crime Prevention: Developments, Challenges, and Opportunities. Justice Quarterly, March 2017, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2017.1300312
  • Badan Pusat Statistik. (2023). Statistik Kriminal Indonesia 2023. BPS.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2014). The Selection of a Research Approach. Research Design, 3–23. https://doi.org/45593:01
  • Dimas Aditya Ashari, Maheswari Kinanthi Prabowo Putri, R. D. P. (2024). Aksentuasi Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Kejahatan Mafia Tambang Melalui Penerapan Sistem Interoperabilitas Dalam Mendorong Kewenangan Otonomi Daerah Yang Berkeadilan. Journal of Studia Legalia, 5(November).
  • Fauzi, A. R., Hakim, A., Pendayagunaan, K., Negara, A., Pendayagunaan, K., & Negara, A. (2024). Digitalization of Public Services (Implementation of Digitalization of Public Services in the Kediri City Government and Jember Regency). Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains, 7(10), 3727–3734. https://doi.org/10.56338/jks.v7i10.6146
  • Goodman-delahunty, J. (2021). Measuring Trust and Confidence in Courts. International Journal for Court Admininistration, 12. https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.418
  • Komisi Yudisial. (2022). Survei Persepsi Publik terhadap Sistem Peradilan di Indonesia. Jakarta: KY.
  • Mahkamah Agung. (2023). Laporan Kinerja Mahkamah Agung RI Tahun 2022. Jakarta: MA RI.
  • Mushtaq, S. (2024). Critical Factors and Practices in Mitigating Cybercrimes within E-Government Services: A Rapid Review on Optimising Public Service Management. Information, 1–24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/ info15100619
  • Muttaqin, A. Z. (2024). Innovative Legal Modeling for Interdisciplinary Studies on Law and Economic Behavior. INDONESIAN JOURNAL, 1(1), 60–71.
  • Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik (ITE).
  • Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2010 tentang Pencegahan dan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang
  • PPATK. (2022). Tren Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang di Indonesia. Jakarta: Pusat Pelaporan dan Analisis Transaksi Keuangan
  • Rajabalinejad, M., Dongen, L. Van, & Ramtahalsing, M. (2020). Systems integration theory and fundamentals. Safety and Reliability, 39(1), 83–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/09617353.2020.1712918
  • Simamora, N. A., & Edi Pranoto. (2023). TINJAUAN YURIDIS PENETAPAN STATUS SESEORANG SEBAGAI JUSTICE COLLABORATOR DI INDONESIA. IBLAM LAW REVIEW, 3(1), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.52249
  • Stanford, N., & Mompoloki, R. (2025). Model to explain use of E-Government service change Use of unified theory of acceptance and use of technology and information systems success model to explain use of E-Government service change: Emerging market case. Telematics and Informatics Reports, 17(January), 100190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teler.2025.100190
  • Sucy, C., Arini, M., Muhammad, A., & Suprapto, R. (2024). Reformasi Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia: Tantangan dan Solusi Menuju Keadilan Efektif. Journal Ligitasi Amsir, 11/3(2018), 377–382.
  • Tabiu, R., Intan, N., & Safiuddin, S. (2023). Globalisasi dan Kejahatan Transnasional Terorganisasi Globalization and Organized Transnational Crime. Halu Oleo Law Review. Faculty, 7(1), 99–110.
  • Wicaksono, D. A. (2020). KINERJA DALAM INTEGRATED CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM. MAKARA, SOSIAL HUMANIORA, 16(May), 135–149. https://doi.org/10.7454/mssh.v16i2.1499
  • Yulia, D., & Rinaldi, K. (20244). Strategi Kepolisian dalam Pencegahan dan Penanggulangan Peredaran Narkotika di Polda Riau. JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE AND COLLABORATION, 559–565.
  • Yusuf, A. (2025). Strategic issues in the reform of the criminal procedure code towards an inclusive and effective criminal justice system. Journal of Law Science, 7(1), 105–112.