ETHICAL CHALLENGES OF AI-MEDIATED CULTURAL REPRESENTATION: ALGORITHMIC NARRATIVES, REFUGEE VOICES, AND PARTICIPATORY GOVERNANCE IN TUNISIA

Authors: Marwa Khairallah & Romdhane Khemakhem

ABSTRACT

The rapid proliferation of generative AI has fundamentally altered how cultural narratives are produced, circulated, and contested, raising urgent questions about representational authority, cultural ownership, and algorithmic accountability. Nowhere are these tensions more consequential than in the portrayal of forcibly displaced populations, where AI-generated content increasingly shapes public discourse and policy imaginaries. This study examines the ethical implications of AI-mediated cultural representation of Sub-Saharan refugees in Tunisia, a critical yet underexplored nexus of AI ethics, migration studies, and cultural mediation scholarship. Employing a qualitative normative-empirical design that integrates systematic discourse analysis of AI-generated migration content with semi-structured interviews involving refugees, civil society activists, and media professionals, the study pursues three objectives: (1) to identify representational patterns and ethical tensions embedded in AI-generated migration discourse, (2) to explore how diverse stakeholders perceive and negotiate cultural ownership and narrative authority in algorithmic environments, and (3) to propose a culturally grounded ethical framework for responsible AI mediation. The findings reveal three intersecting dilemmas, narrative appropriation that displaces refugee agency, persistent stereotyping that reinforces reductive tropes, and algorithmic opacity that obscures the logics governing representational choices. Together, these dilemmas expose a critical accountability gap: AI systems produce culturally consequential narratives without meaningful input from the communities they represent. The study contributes to the growing interdisciplinary literature on responsible AI by advancing a participatory governance model that foregrounds refugee perspectives within digital knowledge systems and offers actionable guidelines for culturally responsible algorithmic representation in sensitive sociopolitical contexts.

Keywords: AI ethics; cultural representation; refugee narratives; algorithmic accountability; cultural ownership; participatory AI governance; Responsible AI

REFERENCES

  1. Aldahoul, N., Rahwan, T., & Zaki, Y. (2024). AI-generated faces influence gender stereotypes and racial homogenization. Scientific Reports, 15.
  2. Al-Kfairy, M., Mustafa, D., Kshetri, N., Insiew, M., & Alfandi, O. (2024). Ethical Challenges and Solutions of Generative AI: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Informatics, 11, 58.
  3. Bianchi, F., Kalluri, P., Durmus, E., Ladhak, F., Cheng, M., Nozza, D., Hashimoto, T., Jurafsky, D., Zou, J., & Caliskan, A. (2022). Easily Accessible Text-to-Image Generation Amplifies Demographic Stereotypes at Large Scale. Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency.
  4. Georgiou, M. (2018). Does the subaltern speak? Migrant voices in digital Europe. Popular Communication, 16, 45 – 57.
  5. Ghosh, S., Venkit, P., Gautam, S., Wilson, S., & Caliskan, A. (2024). Do Generative AI Models Output Harm while Representing Non-Western Cultures: Evidence from A Community-Centered Approach. ArXiv, abs/2407.14779.
  6. Gillespie, T. (2024). Generative AI and the politics of visibility. Big Data & Society.
  7. Hart, C. (2025). Using generative AI to investigate the multimodal representation of refugees and migrants. Discourse & Society.
  8. He, Z., Su, J., Chen, L., Wang, T., & Lc, R. (2024). ‘I Recall the Past’: Exploring How People Collaborate with Generative AI to Create Cultural Heritage Narratives. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 9, 1 – 30.
  9. Herrie, M., Maleve, N., Philipsen, L., & Staunæs, A. (2024). Democratization and generative AI image creation: aesthetics, citizenship, and practices. AI & SOCIETY, 40, 3495 – 3507.
  10. Inuwa-Dutse, I. (2023). FATE in AI: Towards Algorithmic Inclusivity and Accessibility. Proceedings of the 3rd ACM Conference on Equity and Access in Algorithms, Mechanisms, and Optimization.
  11. Jääskeläinen, P., Sharma, N., Pallett, H., & Åsberg, C. (2025). Intersectional analysis of visual generative AI: the case of stable diffusion. Ai & Society, 40, 4341 – 4362.
  12. Jenks, C. (2024). Communicating the cultural other: trust and bias in generative AI and large language models. Applied Linguistics Review, 16, 787 – 795.
  13. Kaneti, M. (2023). What can AI see? The image of the ‘migrant’ in the era of AI post-visualization. Journal of Global Ethics, 19, 307 – 322.
  14. Karpouzis, K. (2024). Plato’s Shadows in the Digital Cave: Controlling Cultural Bias in Generative AI. Electronics.
  15. Kay, J., Kasirzadeh, A., & Mohamed, S. (2024). Epistemic Injustice in Generative AI. ArXiv, abs/2408.11441. .
  16. Kerr, A., Barry, M., & Kelleher, J. (2020). Expectations of artificial intelligence and the performativity of ethics: Implications for communication governance. Big Data & Society, 7.
  17. Mbalaka, B. (2023). Epistemically violent biases in artificial intelligence design: the case of DALLE-E 2 and Starry AI. Digital Transformation and Society.
  18. Mei, B., & Zhu, H. (2024). The Ethical Dilemma and Governance Path of Generative AI in Cultural Communication. Proceedings of the 2024 3rd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Education.
  19. Óhéigeartaigh, S., Whittlestone, J., Liu, Y., Zeng, Y., & Liu, Z. (2020). Overcoming Barriers to Cross-cultural Cooperation in AI Ethics and Governance. Philosophy & Technology, 33, 571 – 593.
  20. Olier, J., & Spadavecchia, C. (2022). Stereotypes, disproportions, and power asymmetries in the visual portrayal of migrants in ten countries: an interdisciplinary AI-based approach. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9, 1-16.
  21. Pansoni, S., Tiribelli, S., Paolanti, M., Frontoni, E., & Giovanola, B. (2023). Design of an Ethical Framework for Artificial Intelligence in Cultural Heritage. 2023 IEEE International Symposium on Ethics in Engineering, Science, and Technology (ETHICS), 1-5.
  22. Pasipamire, N., & Muroyiwa, A. (2024). Navigating algorithm bias in AI: ensuring fairness and trust in Africa. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 9.
  23. Qadri, R., Shelby, R., Bennett, C., & Denton, R. (2023). AI’s Regimes of Representation: A Community-centered Study of Text-to-Image Models in South Asia. Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency.
  24. Rettberg, J., & Wigers, H. (2025). AI-generated stories favour stability over change: homogeneity and cultural stereotyping in narratives generated by gpt-4o-mini. ArXiv, abs/2507.22445.
  25. Ricaurte, P. (2022). Ethics for the majority world: AI and the question of violence at scale. Media, Culture & Society, 44, 726 – 745.
  26. Sahin-Mencutek, Z., Barthoma, S., Gökalp-Aras, N., & Triandafyllidou, A. (2022). A crisis mode in migration governance: comparative and analytical insights. Comparative Migration Studies, 10.
  27. Sartori, L., & Theodorou, A. (2022). A sociotechnical perspective for the future of AI: narratives, inequalities, and human control. Ethics and Information Technology, 24.
  28. Sbabo, A., & Bueno, A. (2025). Artificial intelligence and otherness. InMediaciones de la Comunicación.
  29. Solaiman, I., Talat, Z., Agnew, W., Ahmad, L., Baker, D., Blodgett, S., Chen, C., Daum’e, H., Dodge, J., Evans, E., Friedrich, F., Gohar, U., Hooker, S., Jernite, Y., Luccioni, A., Lusoli, A.,
  30. Sonni, A., Hafied, H., Irwanto, I., & Latuheru, R. (2024). Digital Newsroom Transformation: A Systematic Review of the Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Journalistic Practices, News Narratives, and Ethical Challenges. Journalism and Media.
  31. Tiribelli, S., Pansoni, S., Frontoni, E., & Giovanola, B. (2024). Ethics of Artificial Intelligence for Cultural Heritage: Opportunities and Challenges. IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society, 5, 293-305.
  32. Udupa, S., Maronikolakis, A., & Wisiorek, A. (2023). Ethical scaling for content moderation: Extreme speech and the (in)significance of artificial intelligence. Big Data & Society, 10.
  33. Vice, J., Akhtar, N., Hartley, R., & Mian, A. (2023). Quantifying Bias in Text-to-Image Generative Models. IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, 22, 5658-5671.
  34. Yilma, K. (2025). Ethics of AI in Africa: Interrogating the role of Ubuntu and AI governance initiatives. Ethics and Information Technology, 27.